Analysis

Intermittent access to internet suggests Tehran may fear new uprising

By Ardeshir Kordestani

image

Iranian protesters gather around a fire during a demonstration in Tehran in November 2019. [AFP]

Reports from Iran over the past few weeks and months of slowed down internet speeds and intermittent outages suggest the regime may be trying to tamp down on a new round of civil unrest.

For more than a decade, the Islamic Republic has regularly restricted its citizens' access to the internet, slowed down web traffic, jailed online activists and used web-based location tracking tools to crack down on protests.

Iran's telecommunications industry is in large part controlled by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which, through its cybercrime unit, has been cracking down on internal dissent for over 10 years.

For instance in late 2019, amid widespread protests in response to a sudden tripling of petrol prices, internet access was totally disrupted for several days. Later, authorities allowed access but connectivity was limited for weeks after.

image

Tens of thousands of Iranians took to the streets in January 2020, demanding the regime's top leaders resign. [File]

Fear of unrest

"Internet speeds are intentionally kept low," said Nazanin Mashhadi, an Iran-based architect.

"Ostensibly, we are paying for high-speed internet, but they cap the speeds," she said. A WhatsApp video call froze during her remarks for this article late at night Tehran time.

That is not unusual, she said, noting that it happens "because they throttle the connection".

Acknowledging intermittent slowness and outages, regime officials say the throttling of internet speed is aimed at slowing the flow of "immoral content", including pornography or other sexually suggestive material, into the country.

However, data from non-governmental organisation NetBlocks, which monitors freedom of access to the internet, indicates that the primary driver behind restricting internet speeds in Iran is the regime's fear of social unrest and protests.

"The information vacuum continues to limit human rights monitoring and coverage of incidents on the ground," NetBlocks said at the time.

Shortly after Iran throttled the internet and blocked popular messaging apps, the US Treasury imposed sanctions on Mohammad-Javad Azari Jahromi, Iran's Minister of Communications and Information Technology, for advancing Iran's policy of internet censorship.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin issued a statement, saying, "Iran's leaders know that a free and open internet exposes their illegitimacy, so they seek to censor internet access to quell anti-regime protests."

'Futile effort'

On July 16, 2020, NetBlocks reported that authorities in Iran's Arab-majority Khuzestan province sharply reduced internet speeds amid protests against the Islamic Republic's foreign policy and dire domestic economic conditions.

In December 2020, authorities slowed internet speeds after Iranians began posting memories of the 2019 protests online -- including instances of protesters being shot by the IRGC and security forces.

"It is a futile effort; a representation of the same censorship policies that the Islamic Republic has been pursuing for the past few decades," said a US-based former Iranian naval analyst, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Comparing the regime's efforts to restrict internet access to its early efforts at redacting material in English-language news magazines in circulation in Tehran, he said, "Officials think they can make reality disappear by restricting access to information."

This only undermines the credibility of the authorities, especially in this day and age, when there are so many avenues to find things out in real time, he said.

Double standard

Even as the Islamic Republic cracks down on protesters for using social media and the internet to document repression against citizens, regime officials use it to spread their own propaganda.

Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, President Hassan Rouhani and even Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei all use Twitter regularly, just to name a few.

Among all Iranian officials on Twitter, Zarif is the most active, appears to have the largest audience and receives the most reactions to his tweets, most of which are posted in English.

"Zarif's main task is to cover up the true face of the Islamic Republic in the world, and he is carrying out the task very openly on Twitter," said Tehran-based journalist Mina Bashiri.

For instance, Bashiri said, "he tweets about human rights in Iran. He defends the regime and says human rights are not violated and religious minorities are not suppressed in Iran".

These assertions fly in the face of recent evidence.

This double standard angers the public, who have been using VPNs -- or what is referred to as "filter-breaker" -- for several years to overcome the hurdles the regime creates by restricting their access to the internet.

Through this technology, most Iranians are able to access many of the internet sites they desire, even if that means paying more money for it.

Is Iranian influence good for the Middle East?
2 Comment(s)
Comment Policy * Denotes Required Field 1500 / 1500

Well, in addition to the Iranian regime's control over the Internet speed - as a result of which, it constantly increases or decreases the speed based on the social situation - there are even reports that security services in such countries as Iran distribute their VIP services among users at a lower price so that the regime can achieve its own oppressive agenda. If you Google the phrase "VPN Sales" in Persian, you will find these state-owned VPN vendors' websites. Apparently, they are fast and their ports usually cause no headache due to the lack of cryptology in the state-owned VPN. In addition to following repressive objectives, however, the Islamic Republic has also committed theft; for, the accounts that they recently sell do not work at all, with their bank portal being the only active service in order for them to receive money.

Reply

Internet and electricity in some areas! The fact of the matter is that the Islamic Republic has reached the end of the line. I do not know what it wants to do. It has robbed the people and has increased the prices of food items several hundred times. It is incapable of doing anything other than blatant repression, blatant theft, and blatant corruption. It has been sending the wealth of the Iranian people to the region, and now it appears that North Africa – including Libya, Sudan, etc. - has also been added to this list. As for the Internet, it must be said that since the Islamic Republic is an ideological, backward, and authoritarian regime, it does not tolerate any opinion other than its own opinion, which it imposes upon people. Hence, the Internet has become a tool in the hands of the people and the opposition of the Islamic Republic. This shows that the people in Iran are significantly and fundamentally different from the government. The authoritarian Islamic Republic's security-oriented approach to the Internet is a natural thing. It is also normal for the Islamic Republic to repeatedly disconnect and reconnect the Internet. Even right now, when I was trying to connect, our encrypted VPN's were almost blocked, to the extent that I had to use several VPN models to connect to the internet, waiting to see when they catch my bandwidth. Needless to say, we have access to information through satellites; but it is very pleasant for a person to come on the Internet and swear at

Reply